Opposition Blasts Circular No. 5 as Unconstitutional and Discriminatory in Pre-Election Uproar
The political heat is rising in Seychelles as the Seychelles United Movement (SUM) takes a firm stand against Circular No. 5 of 2025, calling it an “unconstitutional power grab” aimed at stifling grassroots democracy just months before the crucial general elections.
The controversial circular—issued by the Ministry of Local Government and Community Affairs—prohibits individuals involved in active political campaigns from participating in district and community-based activities, including access to community centers, district events, and government-funded programs. It has sparked outrage across the political spectrum, but it is SUM that has emerged as the loudest voice of protest.
In a strongly worded statement, SUM’s presidential candidate, Maarco Francis, declared:
“This is not just bad governance—it is open warfare against democracy.
They know they’re losing public support, and now they’re trying to tilt the playing field in their favor by silencing local engagement.
This circular is a cowardly attempt to cut off the people from their own communities—just because they don’t support the ruling party.
It’s unconstitutional, it’s discriminatory, and it reeks of desperation.”
Francis warned that the circular could have dangerous ripple effects, particularly on volunteers and youth who are trying to participate in civil society but now face a government-imposed muzzle if they affiliate with opposition politics.
According to Circular No. 5, individuals actively involved in political campaigns—whether as candidates, party agents, or organizers—must immediately step back from all roles in community associations, district events, and even charity-linked government activities. Critics say this unfairly targets opposition parties, whose grassroots efforts are often led by community figures and volunteers.
While other opposition groups, including United Seychelles and Mouvman Lavwa Seselwa, have also expressed concern, it is SUM that is spearheading calls for an urgent review of the circular by both the Ombudsman and international election observers.
“We have filed a formal complaint and will not allow the government to rewrite the rules of democracy on the eve of an election,” Francis added.
“This fight is bigger than SUM. It’s about every Seychellois who believes in fair play.
We urge every citizen to read Circular No. 5 and ask themselves—does this feel like freedom?”
Legal experts have begun weighing in, suggesting the circular could face constitutional challenges. Several clauses appear to infringe on rights to association, participation in public life, and equal treatment under the law.
What’s at Stake?
With elections scheduled for September 27, the timing of the circular is being widely interpreted as an attempt to suppress dissent and keep opposition figures out of sight at the community level—where public opinion is often shaped most.
As the nation edges closer to what may be one of its most contentious elections in decades, one thing is clear: Circular No. 5 is now a political flashpoint, and the battle for democratic space is fully underway.
